A judge has rejected Universal’s attempt to toss the Glen Larson’s key claims at the initial stage.
8:39 AM PDT 7/31/2012 by Eriq Gardner, The Hollywood Reporter
Television producer Glen Larson has jumped the first hurdle in his multimillion-dollar lawsuit against Universal over money from a string of hit shows from the 1970s and 1980s.
Larson, whose work includes Knight Rider, Six Million Dollar Man, Magnum P.I. and Battlestar Galactica, claims that the series generated hundreds of millions of dollars for the studio yet he hasn’t received any profit participation statements and “as the shows make more money for Universal, the deficit that Larson Productions must overcome continually increases.”
In a detailed ruling issued this week, Los Angeles Superior Court judge is allowing most of Larson’s claims to move forward over objections made by the studio at the initial stage.
When Larson filed the lawsuit in July 2011, Universal said it was “surprised,” and that Larson hadn’t notified the studio about his claims. Studio litigator Scott Edelman declined to comment on the latest ruling. In defense of the lawsuit, Universal has claimed that the statute of limitations has passed, but Judge James R. Dunn has decided that it is too early to rule on this issue.
Judge Dunn did address the specific causes of auction, including breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, accounting, and fraud. He has found that Larson has sufficiently pled these allegations to survive the demurrer (motion to dismiss).
In getting there, the judge looked at the ambiguity of Larson’s agreements with Universal. The contracts allowed the studio to use “standard accounting practices” without defining that, and included “catch all” language that guided the studio to the “same practices and procedures” it normally used in dealing with gross receipts, distribution expenses and production costs.
Both sides attempted to use the ambiguous language to their advantage. For example, on the issue of whether Universal could report only 20 percent of the home video receipts, the contracts say nothing because it was not a media form available at the time.
If the issue is what’s permitted vs. what’s not permitted, the silence of the contracts favors Larson at this stage of the litigation. “Nothing in the agreements suggest that only a percentage, rather than the entire receipts from such ‘subsidiary rights,’ should be taken into account,” wrote the judge.
Judge Dunn also found that Larson can go forward on his claim that Universal didn’t administer the agreements in good faith, finding sufficient support in the plaintiff’s allegation that Universal was “manipulating the ‘order of recoupment’ in such a way that it only benefits Defendants and completely frustrates and defeats Plaintiff’s right to receive contingent compensation.”
Universal didn’t walk away empty-handed, though. The judge trimmed from the lawsuit Larson’s claims of conversion, unjust enrichment and unfair business practices.
Larson is represented by Neville Johnson, Douglas Johnson and James Ryan of Johnson and Johnson in Beverly Hills.